Skip to content   Skip to footer navigation 

Energy Australia pays $14 million for misleading customers on pricing 

After issuing several infringement notices to smaller retailers, the ACCC has won its first case against one of the ‘big three’. 

energy australia branded car in field
Last updated: 02 October 2024

Need to know

  • Over half-a-million customers of Energy Australia were misled on pricing by the company in mid-2022
  • The company was recently hit with a $14 million penalty for this contravention of the 2019 Electricity Retail Code, which is meant to make comparing offers easier
  • Many thousands of Energy Australia customers may have stayed on what they thought was the best deal when less expensive offers were actually available

Over half-a-million customers of the mega-retailer Energy Australia were misled on pricing by the company in mid-2022, and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) recently closed a case that signals it's serious about enforcing rules against such conduct.

Late last month, Energy Australia was hit with a $14 million penalty in the Federal Court for conveniently ignoring those rules, enacted in 2019, called the Electricity Retail Code.

It was the first time the ACCC has taken an energy retailer to court on such grounds.

Before the 2019 reforms it was anybody's guess who actually had the best deal on offer

The code governs the way electricity retailers communicate prices to customers, and it became mandatory at a time when consumer confusion had reached new heights.

With retailers trotting out new plans left and right, constantly changing the terms of existing plans and offering all manner of tricky discounts, before the 2019 reforms it was anybody's guess who actually had the best deal on offer.

Trying to find the best deal

The Electricity Retail Code – which applies in New South Wales, South Australia, and South-East Queensland – was designed as a corrective action against the many pricing tricks that retailers get up to. 

To maintain compliance, companies have to include both a 'reference price' and 'lowest possible price' on all bills and offers.

You can still end up paying more than you should due to unavoidable confusion about what's on offer

The 'reference price' is based on something known as the Default Market Offer. It's what you pay if you don't choose a specific plan – called a market offer – from your retailer. This default offer is set by the Australian Energy Regulator and is used as a benchmark to compare market offer prices. 

Electricity retailers have to show you the percentage difference between the regulated default offer, or reference price, and their market offers.

The 'lowest possible price' is just that – your electricity retailer has to show you its lowest price on offer and explain any conditions that apply.

As we reported earlier this year, you can still end up paying more than you should due to unavoidable confusion about what's on offer, but the 2019 reforms at least gave electricity customers something to work with.

Failure to disclose

The ACCC investigation caught Energy Australia, one of Australia's market-dominating big three retailers (along with AGL and Origin), failing to include the lowest possible price in its communications to around 566,000 consumers.

Over a three-month period in 2022, the company also advertised 27 different electricity plans that failed to show the percentage difference between the reference price and its market offers, so customers were unable to figure out which deal to take.

And the company also provided inaccurate information about what the average Energy Australia customer would expect to pay on a given plan over a year, so customers were unable to make a comparison.

"Energy Australia's failure to fully inform consumers meant they could not accurately compare offers from competing retailers and may have been denied the opportunity to choose the best deal," says ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb. 

Energy Australia's failure to fully inform consumers meant they could not accurately compare offers from competing retailers

ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb

"Some consumers may also have been misled by Energy Australia's statements into thinking that a price change was less than it actually was, causing them to stay with their existing plan when in fact a different plan may have represented a better deal," says Cass-Gottlieb.

Though this was the ACCC's first win in court against an energy retailer for contravening the Electricity Retail Code, the regulator has previously issued issued infringement notices to Locality Planning Energy, CovaU, ReAmped Energy and Dodo Power & Gas for allegedly failing to include certain mandatory information when communicating prices.

The regulator also accepted court-enforceable undertakings from CovaU and Dodo for breaches of the code.

We care about accuracy. See something that's not quite right in this article? Let us know or read more about fact-checking at CHOICE.

Stock images: Getty, unless otherwise stated.